• Tipping the scale at 230 (5'10) in May, 2007, at 30%+ body fat, I decided to do something about it. This blog, formerly a political blog, is about that continuing journey. Having now racked up nearly 60 pounds of fat loss and almost 20 pounds of muscle gain -- now weighing in at 190 and on the way to 10% BF -- I'm ready to reveal my "secrets." I'm enthusiastic about helping others achieve real results. The mainstream advice is mostly wrong.

    One need only take a look around.

    My Latest Progress Photos

    About Me / Contact Information

FTA Resources

Miscellania

Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 11/2003

« A Work of Business Art | Main | The Carnival of Clowns »

Apr 17, 2008

Ouch!

In both the laptop and desktop showdowns, Apple’s computers were the winners. Oddly, the big difference didn’t come in our user ratings, where we expected the famously friendly Mac interface to shine. Our respondents liked the look and feel of both operating systems but had a slight preference toward OS X. In our speed trials, however, Leopard OS trounced Vista in all-important tasks such as boot-up, shutdown and program-launch times. We even tested Vista on the Macs using Apple’s platform-switching Boot Camp software—and found that both Apple computers ran Vista faster than our PCs did. (emphasis added)

Poor Bill. ...Cuz, y'know, if you need a fast machine to run Vista, you'll need to get a Mac; and if you get a Mac, then ya might as well run the Mac OS.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It's easy to beat fat, slow, overengineered Vista. But Vista has been rejected by the marketplace. Why didn't the testers try Leopard against Windows XP Pro, or even Windows 2000 Pro?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search the Animal